House rejects Capitol repair, bonding bill in doubtST. PAUL — Minnesotans should be proud of their Capitol and repair its crumbling outside walls, its outdated electrical system and interior that is falling apart, Republicans said Thursday in an unsuccessful effort to fund the long-discussed work.
By: Don Davis, The Republican Eagle
ST. PAUL — Minnesotans should be proud of their Capitol and repair its crumbling outside walls, its outdated electrical system and interior that is falling apart, Republicans said Thursday in an unsuccessful effort to fund the long-discussed work.
Eleven Democrats joined Republicans in an 80-50 vote to sell $221 million of bonds to finance the work. It needed 81 votes to pass.
“I am not going to bring it up (again) unless (the Democrats) will come ask,” bill sponsor Rep. Larry Howes, R-Walker, said.
Thursday’s vote raises doubt about a general public works financing bill that Democrats want to grow. Howes, chairman of the public works financing committee, said he can wait. “I’m a patient man.”
However, little time remains. Legislative leaders want to adjourn the 2012 session by April 30.
Dramatic and emotional speeches about fixing the Capitol punctuated debate. Some people say more time is needed to analyze the problem, Rep. Dean Urdahl, R-Grove City, said.
“To them, I say, analyze this before another piece of the Capitol crumbles down,” Urdahl said, hoisting in the air a 15-pound chunk of Georgian marble that had fallen off the building’s exterior.
For Majority Leader Matt Dean, R-Dellwood, the discussion was about pride in the Minnesota seat of government.
“Has anyone seen North Dakota’s Capitol?” he asked. “It’s like State Farm calling: ‘We want our building back.’”
“It’s embarrassing,” he said about North Dakota’s Capitol, one of the country’s three “skyscraper” capitols.
Howes told colleagues that Minnesotans support fixing the Capitol, and Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton backs it. With two Republicans gone for the day, and one seat vacant, the vote was one short of the 81 needed for passage.
“If we can’t commit to this, what can we commit to?” Howes asked.
The Senate public works bill, to be funded by the state selling bonds, includes $25 million for the Capitol in a nearly $500 million proposal.
The House opted to break the Capitol into its own bill, apart from other public works projects. Its main public works bill would spend $280 million, which Democrats say is far too little, so they withheld votes on the Capitol bill.
House Minority Leader Paul Thissen, DFL-Minneapolis, said that during the vote he offered House Speaker Kurt Zellers, R-Maple Grove, to deliver the Capitol votes if he would commit to offering a $775 million public works bill. Republicans say they cannot support one that large.
“They want a very focused bonding bill,” Urdahl said about his GOP colleagues.
“What Minnesota needs is a bonding bill more robust with projects around the state,” Thissen said.
Democrats have been more vocal about the need to pump up the second public works bill, so its future is unclear in light of the Thursday vote.
“We will take a deep breath and wait for a little bit,” Howes said about the future of the two bills.
However, he said, “I am not going to sell my soul to restore the people’s house.”
Zellers said he and Howes thought they had the votes to pass both bills, but after the Capitol bill failed, that is in question. The plan, Zellers said, was to pass the Capitol bill first and then the general public works borrowing bill.
Zellers said disagreements still remain on the amount to be spent on the public works bill. He said Democrats were playing political games with the Capitol bill to try to influence the other bonding bill.
“To hold one hostage for the other is pretty petty and kind of embarrassing,” Zellers said.
Howes said Democrats withheld votes so they can campaign saying the Republican-controlled House and Senate resulted in a “no-nothing Legislature.”
He said Democratic-leaning union members packed the House gallery during debate and House Democrats defied their party’s governor.
Howes called Democrats “a do-nothing minority.”
“Greed is stepping on” fixing the Capitol, Howes added.
Urdahl, a long-time Capitol supporter and history buff, said the repair bill should have passed “because it is the right thing to do.”
The building was not designed in 1905 for today’s electronic uses, he said. “The future of our Capitol, the people’s house, is up to us.”
Rep. Denny McNamara, R-Hastings, said fixing the Capitol should be a source of pride. When his grandchildren visit the Capitol one day, he would like them to say: “Grandpa McNamara helped fund that so it would get done right. He didn’t patch it together.”
Rep. Morrie Lanning, R-Moorhead, has worked on Capitol restoration for several years. He said this is the first time there has been a comprehensive plan to fix the building.
“This Capitol restoration project is long overdue, long overdue,” Lanning said. “We have been tinkering for a number of years.
He criticized Democrats, who suggested phasing in the project instead of approving all funding at once. That, they said, would allow for more non-Capitol projects.
“All of us have individual needs … but all of us have a responsibility to the people of Minnesota to take care of this treasure,” Lanning said.
Some Democrats said that funding the entire Capitol project now would hurt flood prevention funding, something Lanning champions.
Rep. Kent Eken, DFL-Twin Valley, said that passing the Capitol project would be getting the cart before the horse.
“We need to talk about the whole state,” he said, which is what the main public works bonding bill would do. “That would create a more prosperous economy throughout the state.”
Don Davis reports for Forum Communications Co.